Links

Links You Will like

Our Recommendation

Links

Search

Showing posts with label httprsscsmonitor. Show all posts
Showing posts with label httprsscsmonitor. Show all posts

Saturday, December 18, 2010

College tuition: Judge throws the prosecution of illegal (http://rss.csmonitor)

OMAHA, Nebraska

A judge in Nebraska on a lawsuit Friday challenge a law that allows some to pay State of college tuition illegal immigrants.

Jefferson County District Judge Paul Korslund held six Nebraskans who claimed that their tax dollars have been spent in violation of federal law should first went to the Federal Government and may renew the challenge before the courts of the State if the Federal Government refuses to act.

Lawyer plaintiffs, Kris Kobach called dismissal "a bump on the road" and said he wasn't sure if he appeal dismissal of judge or to request Department of Homeland Security to respond.

"The case is far from finished," said Kobach, recently elected Kansas Secretary of State led to disputes in other States targeting illegal immigration.

The lawsuit filed in January said taxes by Fairbury residents served in support of right to the immigration-tuition fees for the State in violation of federal law. Trial appointed Council of the University of Nebraska Regents and other advice as the defendants State college and asked the judge to prevent school officials on the Act.

Attorney Joel Pedersen University agreed that dismissal left open over potential disputes but refused to speculate how applicants will proceed.

Act is adopted in 2005, says students whose parents brought the United States illegally can pay lower fees in State as they graduate schools in Nebraska, experienced in the State for at least three years and are continuing or promise of legal status. Rules for residency requirements and nonresident tuition fees are governed by the law of the State.

Opponents of the Bill say that it is unfair legal residents and conflicts with the Constitution of United States and a federal law of 1996 which prohibit benefits for illegal immigrants without giving Americans the break even higher education institutions.

In state tuition can be significantly cheaper than the costs for residents outside. For example, the cost of tuition undergraduate at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln is about $6,000 per year for students in the States and $17,650 to those of the State.

Kobach has brought a similar action in California, where the State Supreme Court held last month that illegal immigrants are entitled to tuition breaks even offered in state high school students attending public colleges and universities. Kobach, which represented a group of U.S. students seeking to invalidate the California law, said that it would appeal the decision of the Supreme Court.

The California legislature has adopted the measure in 2001 that allowed any student regardless of the status of immigration, who attended high school in California at least three years and graduated to qualify for tuition fees in the States in colleges and universities in the State. In state tuition saves each State student about $11,000 per year and each student at the University of California on $23,000 per annum.

Several other States, including New York and Texas, have similar laws.

Follow bloggers and economic coverage on Twitter @ CSMecon or Facebook.

Tuesday, December 14, 2010

Hybrid cars: "Yo" from Russia (http://rss.csmonitor)

MOSCOW

The Russian billionaire owner of the New Jersey Nets has introduced a new range of hybrid cars - called "Yo" - which he hopes to start selling in 2012.

Go to the next paragraph

Mikhail Prokhorov, said Monday cars, propelled by gasoline and electricity, are "socially important products" hope "overcome stereotypes... the Russia can't do normal cars."

Vehicles must be sold in three models - sport sedan and a small truck - with a price of about $10,000 (€7,550).

The name is written in Russia by the letter E, with two points above.

Prokhorov, who amassed a fortune in the banking sector and the metals, bought a majority shareholding in the basketball team this year.

Thursday, December 9, 2010

Credit cards: be careful on these promos (http://rss.csmonitor)

Translate Request has too much data
Parameter name: request
Translate Request has too much data
Parameter name: request

What’s inside? Here are the questions answered in today’s reader mailbag, boiled down to five word summaries. Click on the number to jump straight down to the question.
1. Basic credit questions
2. How to make money blogging?
3. Favorite podcasts
4. Television compromise
5. Connecting with teens cheaply
6. Overly long “to-do” list
7. Maximizing credit card promos
8. Refinance or not?
9. Quibids?
10. Plant-based snacks

Skip to next paragraph Trent Hamm

The Simple Dollar is a blog for those of us who need both cents and sense: people fighting debt and bad spending habits while building a financially secure future and still affording a latte or two. Our busy lives are crazy enough without having to compare five hundred mutual funds – we just want simple ways to manage our finances and save a little money.

This year, I’ve found myself in two different Secret Santa exchanges.

When I was younger, I used to worry way too much about what I was receiving. I didn’t want to participate in such exchanges because I didn’t want to receive something awful while putting effort into giving something nice.

Now, I barely care what I receive. It’s all about making sure the recipient gets something worthwhile and enjoyable that puts a smile on their face.

Oh, how perspectives change.

Q1: Basic credit questions
I’m a 23 year old University student. I’ve had a credit card since I was 18 (which I just recently – and finally – paid off), and I have a student line of credit with at $12000+ balance. Furthermore, two years ago I took out a loan from my credit union to buy a car which is also paid off. My question is, how do I know what my credit score is and if it’s good or bad? Also, what’s the best way to actually build a good credit score? I was always told I could but something with my credit card (perhaps a CD or something, nothing more than $50), then pay it off right away rather than make minimum payments which just costs more interest. Is this true?
- Tyler

You can’t know your exact credit score without buying it from one of the credit agencies. They all offer programs where you can pay them some small fee to peek at your calculated credit score.

Of course, your credit score is based on your credit report, which you can view for free at annualcreditreport – it’s a site run by the Federal Trade Commission to allow people to view their credit report annually for no cost. Although you don’t get to see your actual credit score, you will be able to verify if there are any incorrect reports on your credit history and see what positive reports are there.

You can also use a number of credit score estimators, like the one at MyFICO, to use the information on your report to get a rough estimate of your credit score. From what I’ve seen, such estimates are usually accurate to within ten points or so.

As for improving your credit, you’re right in that making small purchases and paying them off is the best way to build credit because it demonstrates a positive payment history. I would suggest that you use the card to handle some routine purchase, like gas or groceries, then pay the bill in full as soon as it arrives.

Q2: How to make money blogging?
I have been wanting to find out exactly HOW to accumulate a few dollars of income through click-ads. You had mentioned in your Simple Dollar Rule #11 that we should all try to generate a few dollars from our blog. I know that without an appropriate amount of traffic, one may not generate enough each month to fill a pocket. But that’s not really my concern right now. I just want to know the ‘how-to” so I may feel more motivated about my (not-so-skillful) writings. You see, I love to write and I love to snap (photos). My dream is to one day quit my corporate cell, I mean, cube, and to be able to hold down a lower-paying job closer to home so that I can finally spend more time to write, photograph and jog, my three biggest passions.
- Rachel

Blogging is certainly one way to earn some pocket money, but there are many ways to do that. Earning money from a blog is very interesting because at first, you don’t earn much of anything at all, which weeds out people who won’t stick with it.

You earn money in the long run by having an archive of good posts that others have linked to. As a result, these older posts show up in Google searches, bringing people to your site. The more good older posts you have, the more people you’ll bring to your site without any additional effort.

What you need to do is to ask yourself if you’re writing anything anyone would care about. Can you envision a reasonable scenario where someone would Google a term, find your page, and be pleased with what they find, enough to stick around and read more? If you’re not writing that kind of stuff – either useful or entertaining or, ideally, both – then you’re going to have a very hard time succeeding at blogging.

Once you’ve done this, though, then earning money is fairly easy – just put some ads on the site and be patient.

The key is content. If it’s good stuff, all you have to do is get the word out a little bit (join some blog carnivals associated with your topic, for one) and then put some ads on your site. Then wait (and keep making good content, of course).

Q3: Favorite podcasts
As a fellow avid podcast listener, I’m always interested to hear what podcasts people regularly listen to. What are your favorites?
- Matt

Aside from a few NPR shows that I listen to in podcast form because it’s more convenient (Planet Money, Fresh Air, Wait Wait, Don’t Tell Me, etc.), I listen to these podcasts regularly.

Radiolab, which is a science podcast that’s probably one of the best things on the internet
Pardon the Interruption, a sports podcast that keeps me at least up to date on the “watercooler” talk in the sports world
This American Life, a collection of audio essays on a seemingly infinite array of topics
The B.S. Report, a podcast ostensibly about sports but tends to branch out into all sorts of topics
The Dice Tower, which focuses on board and card games
Grammar Girl, which is a very short entertaining podcast on grammar issues

There are a lot of great podcasts up there. This batch is pretty much all I can keep up with during a given week, since I usually listen to them in the background and play them twice or three times each so I can absorb more of them as I’m working.

Q4: Television compromise
My wife and I have strongly contrasting views on our television. To put it simply, I barely watch it. My wife watches about 10 hours of television a week. I watch roughly 3 hours and those are usually sporting events outside of our home. Our satellite bill is about $100 a month because of all the premium channels we get. Now, I don’t begrudge that money being spent, but each of us gets a certain “allowance” each month of money to spend freely. I think that money should come out of her allowance, but she says it’s just a shared bill. What do you think?
- Ronald

I think that you both have a point, to some extent. I also think this is an issue you need to resolve ASAP before it dissolves into something poisonous in your marriage, because I can sense some angst in your email.

Your wife’s point is that this is a service that you can use any time you wish and if you choose not to, that’s your choice, but it shouldn’t be eliminated because it’s a service that is actually used in your home. Your point is that it’s a service that I’m paying for and not using.

Here’s my honest suggestion: take note of how much television you both watch for a few months. See whether or not the disparity is really as big as you’re thinking. You might be surprised to find that your wife doesn’t watch as much as you think or that you watch more than you think.

If you have hard numbers that shows that you do spend a lot less time watching than her, then consider a proportional share of the billing. Take the cable bill, divide it in half, and then add that much to your respective “mad money” for the month. Then, you each pay a portion of the bill out of your “mad money” that lines up with how much you’re using it.

The important thing is to not let this fester, as it can grow into a much bigger problem over time.

Q5: Connecting with teens cheaply
Lately, I’ve felt like there’s a big gulf between me and my two daughters (age sixteen and fourteen) that didn’t used to be there. They’re not the partying type – in fact, they don’t leave the house all that much. It doesn’t feel like we have the same connection we used to have, though, and I’m trying to find inexpensive ways to rebuild that connection. Any ideas?
- Charlie

My usual suggestion is to tell parents of teens to institute a family night or two a week, but that doesn’t really seem to be needed in your case if your kids are already homebodies. What you need is simply some activities that you all do together.

If you want to make a formal thing out of it, start a family game night where, once a week, you all play games together. It gets you all around the same table for an hour or two, at least.

If you want something less formal, just ask your children what they’d like to do this evening together, your treat. You might be surprised as to what they come up with.

Q6: Overly long “to-do” list
I love the system and it’s helped me a lot. One problem I have though is that my “Next Action Steps” list is INCREDIBLY long. With everything personal plus work related (and a lot of work projects going on at any one time), it’s just a huge, huge list. David Allen suggests organizing by location where it needs to be done (i.e. “Phone”, “Computer”), but even that doesn’t help, as it’s still a very, very long list. (Many people must have this problem, as I’m not the only one with a lot on my plate.) I find the mix of important and un-important things on the list makes it difficult for me to get the most important things done, as the important next action steps get lost in the huge number of things on the list. Do you prioritize? Or organize it some other way? I find every morning I’m going through the list again and re-prioritizing, which takes a good bit of time and is not very productive (or in the spirit of the list, which is supposed to simplify). Do you have thoughts on this? (or could you share some old version of your “next action steps” list as it looks to you?)
- Valerie

My biggest trick is to simply recognize that a lot of this stuff is realistically never going to happen. If my list gets beyond about 25 or 30 items, I make a conscious effort to whack some items from the list, either by rapid-firing the very short ones or by other means.

Other means? I’ll just admit to myself that the closet isn’t getting cleaned out any time soon. Then, I’ll remove that item from the list and put it on a “someday/maybe” list. Or, I’ll recognize that returning some minor call isn’t really important and I’ll just completely purge the thing.

If you have a list that’s that long, then you’ve got a sure sign that you are stuffing too much into your life. That means it’s time to whack the unimportant stuff.

Q7: Maximizing credit card promos
you see saving is also a top priority for me, i do save, as much as my income is variable (i run a business) i can forecast my future earnings but I still set fixed savings.

here’s the deal. my credit card has a promo right now, if i use it for a single transaction of 10 thousand pesos (im from the philippines) i would get a P500 worth of gift certificates in return that i could used at various shops (mostly clothing stores) for FREE!!!

i was so excited when i learned about this promo!but want to make sure i am doing the right thing before i push through with it, you see i only use my credit card if they have appealing promos and freebies,and i ALWAYS pay my bill FULL and ON TIME,so that i could really enjoy the benefits. My business gives me the opportunity to use it for business purposes (PROMISE) and i consider that to be a huge advantage,because i get promos without spending on personal items.

i have a 150 thousand credit line with the card with this promo,i want to use it and charge 500 thousand (around $12,000 ) so i could get 25 thousand ($600) worth of free shopping!!! december is coming near so i can use this to purchase gifts for my family as well. the problem is like i said i only have 150 thousand credit line, and because i don’t carry any balance, i only need to have an extra credit line of 350 thousand ($8,200) for me to complete this target,to do this i will dig into my savings and withdraw this amount and make the advanced payment on the card so the ceiling would go to 500 thousand when i use it. is it worth it?

learning from the simple dollar self discipline and clear goals makes me hesitant to touch my savings,if i do this, the possible time that i could return the said amount to my savings would be in february next year. because the goods that i will purchase with the card would be sold at terms and will be paid by my clients in 60 days,this means i will get the amount by the end of january,that’s why i said i would have surely placed it back in my savings account by february. should i do this?should i touch my savings so i can get advantage with the promo? if it helps,i would still have my emergency fund even if i do this,i just feel a little uncomfortable doing it and parting with my savings for almost 3 months,just to have some sort of free shopping spree. I just want to hear your opinion on touching savings for things like this.
- Leon

This is a very bad idea, in my opinion. You are putting cash savings at risk in order to cash in on a fairly small credit card reward while also leaving yourself in a very precarious position where your entire emergency fund is held by the credit card company. I would never, ever put my family at that kind of risk for a few Christmas presents.

If you want a much better solution, take the $250 from your savings account and use that to buy the gifts. Then, over the next few months, replenish that money so that you’re right back where you started.

Credit card rewards are a nice perk, but you should never put your own money at risk in an effort to try to squeeze out more of them, especially when it requires you to hand over your savings and charge the card like crazy.

Q8: Refinance or not?
Should we refinance our mortgage into a 15-year fixed mortgage from our 30-year fixed?

Our current mortgage has a balance of $358,000 and is at 6.5% fixed. We have 25 years left on it (it started out at $380,000 and we made some extra principal payments over the last few years).

We suspect that our house might appraise at between $330K and $350K. Yeah, that sucks…

We have about $100,000 to put down on the mortgage. About $60,000 is in a full-service (non-retirement) brokerage account that we were hesitant about touching until now. The rest is in savings accounts. We would like to only put down $80K – $90K because we still want to have some savings for emergencies. We have about $190,000 in retirement accounts that we don’t plan on touching. We are in our early 30s. Together, we make about $160,000 yearly gross income. No other debt (besides this awful mortgage) and no kids (yet).

Do you think we should pull that money out of the brokerage firm and refinance? I don’t feel so bad about doing it because the interest rate on our mortgage is so high and I really want to avoid paying PMI if we refinance.

I’m calling the mortgage broker tomorrow, but do you think we’re making the right move? I just hate the fact that we’re paying 6.5% interest on our mortgage. (When we bought the house, we accepted a higher interest rate to avoid PMI.) We also really, really want to have the house paid off in 15 years or sooner, so it’s not really about the lower monthly payment for us.
- Michelle

From my perspective, it depends on how much you would have left in your savings to cover emergencies if you did this. If this move would devour all of your savings and leave you at risk in the case of an emergency, then I absolutely would not do it.

What should you do if you can’t swing it right now? Wait, and save. There’s no real emergency rush to do this, as mortgage rates aren’t going to climb rapidly in the near future.

What’s an adequate emergency fund? I would make sure I could cover two months’ worth of living expenses for each dependent in the house. So, if there are three of you there, you should have six months’ worth of living expenses on hand.

Q9: Quibids?
What are your thoughts on quibids.com or xbids.com? Websites that claim to allow consumers to win auctions on items at ridiculously cheap prices. Seems like a scam to me requiring entirely too much time.
- Darren

I view sites like this as a combination of a game and a pretty ordinary retail site.

Take the example that Quibids uses. You have to buy bids from them – say, 300 bids for $180. Then, you use those bids in an auction – each time someone bids, the value of the auction goes up one or two or five cents.

I tried out Quibids and most auctions seem to keep getting bids up to about 25-30% of the retail value of the item. Let’s say you’re bidding on a Wii – that means it goes up to $40 or so. To get to that value, literally thousands of bids had to be tossed out there, meaning the site just made about $300 or so from that auction.

Remember, when you see the price paid for an auction, that’s not including the value of the dozens or hundreds of bids the person had to spend to get the item (at a cost of $0.30 to $0.60 per bid) and the hours they had to sit there bidding until they won the item.

However, they do give you the ability to buy an item for the retail price minus the number of bids you placed.

If you were strictly bidding on items that you would buy anyway and don’t care about paying retail price on them, then it’s fine, but I’d rather shop around and get the item below retail. If you’re not doing that, then it’s just a very expensive game.

Q10: Plant-based snacks
My biggest problem whenever I try diets is cravings. I’ll do fine at meals, but in the middle of the day, I’ll start craving foods and without thinking, I’ll snarf something. How do you deal with that with a plant-based diet?
- Mel

There are lots of good vegan snacks, and I keep quite a few around at arm’s length.

Fruits. Pumpkin seeds. Larabars. Nuts. Things like these are my snacks, and they’re very important because they keep me from overeating at meal times. Instead, I just eat a reasonable amount at meals because I’m already at least somewhat full.

I find that having such foods at arm’s length ensures that I’ll eat those snacks instead of being ravenous at meal times or eating something less healthy.

Got any questions? Email them to me or leave them in the comments and I’ll attempt to answer them in a future mailbag. However, I do receive hundreds of questions per week, so I may not necessarily be able to answer yours.

Add/view comments on this post.

--------------------------

The Christian Science Monitor has assembled a diverse group of the best economy-related bloggers out there. Our guest bloggers are not employed or directed by the Monitor and the views expressed are the bloggers' own, as is responsibility for the content of their blogs. To contact us about a blogger, click here. To add or view a comment on a guest blog, please go to the blogger's own site by clicking on the link above.

Wednesday, December 8, 2010

"Taxes up." "Low taxes." Why we should look ahead, not behind (http://rss.csmonitor)

My colleague from TPC Howard Gleckman wrote the other day about the confusion caused by multiple use of defenders of the baselines to measure the effects of tax proposals. But baselines are not really important. What is important is not where we start or change things but where we are.
Go to the next paragraph TaxVox
The tax policy Center is a joint venture of the Urban Institute and Brookings Institution. Is comprised of experts nationally recognized in taxation, the budget and social policy who have served the most senior levels of Government. TaxVox is tax Centre for tax policy and fiscal policy blog.
Baselines are largely political. Supporters use whatever version strengthens their ability to bludgeon opponents in a game essentially Inside-the-Beltway. Voters, thoroughly confused by this complex and esoteric scorekeeping cannot discover who is telling the truth.
Because a reference database gives you a starting point for allowing to calculate the change, it allows to measure the effects of tax proposals. You can see that a new tax raises earnings compared to a year before, or that it raises taxes for high-earners to what they were paying sometime in the past. But those who often are the wrong questions.
The problem is that these points of departure are completely arbitrary. Nothing intrinsically "right" or "bad" as it was in 2000 and 2003 tax legislation or this year. Nothing does not one of them more or less worthy as a basis for the measure. To assess whether a given policy gives a good result is our lack of agreement on the correct answer. Seems too regressive tax may seem too progressive for you. Federal revenues claiming that 20 per cent of GDP will look roughly higher for people who are interested in small but anemic Government for those who want the Government to do more.
The right question is what makes a particular level design mean for individuals tax and economy.
For example, leaving all 03 2001 tax cuts expire mean federal revenues total approximately $ 20 per cent of GDP in the Decade to come. makes them any permanent cut this to about 18 percent share. This is true, regardless of whether that you start from the base. In contrast, plan of President Obama extend reductions for all but the percentage of 2 win more money from households claim 19% of GDP. Each option would also distribute taxes in his own way to household income categories. This is also true regardless of what you start with the database.
What you need to do is ask yourself these questions: in view of the increasing concerns about explosion of deficits, federal special fiscal policy generate sufficient revenues to finance the Government want? He collect revenues as effectively as possible so that it is the least harm to the economy? And he divided charges enough on the distribution of income? These queries are difficult to answer but rethink their is much more useful to ask whether the taxes will be increase or drop to a baseline, or if it will take more or less income from the pockets of those particular to sometime in the past income group.
Of course, tax policy choices will be always political. And since we have no absolute standard for assessing taxes, assessments of the proposed amendments will be always subjective. But as you listen to the debate in Washington, keep your eyes on the prize: not reference but on where we are.
Add/view comments on this post.
------------------------------
The Christian Science Monitor has brought together a diverse group of the best economy related bloggers out there. Our guest bloggers are not used or produced by the monitor and the opinions are own bloggers, as it is the responsibility of the contents of their blogs. To contact us for a blogger, click here. To add or view a comment to a guest blog, please visit the blogger by clicking on the link above.

Links You Will like